Gassy Politics
First: Paul Sabin’s stupid op-ed in The New York Times
Saturday shows how intellectually bankrupt and pusillanimous the
“newspaper of record” has become, in step with the depraved and decadent
empire whose record-keeper it supposedly pretends to be. Sabin is
flame-keeper for the theories of the late cornucopian demi-god Julian
Simon, a business school professor whose great idea stokes
the wishful thinking that has overtaken a class of American leaders who
ought to know better, and spread through the public they serve like a
fungal infection of the brain. The core of Julian Simon’s great idea is that material resources don’t matter; human ingenuity will overcome all limits.
Maybe that’s a temporarily
comforting thought for leaders in business, media, and politics, who
don’t want to face the realities of peak resources and climate change,
but it guarantees a harsher economic outcome since the wishful public
will do nothing to prepare for the very different terms of daily living
that are already shoving them into hardship and desperation.
Julian Simon, who died in 1998, is best remembered now for a bet he made in 1980 with biologist Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb.
The bet was supposed to determine whether the converging difficulties
of our time should be taken seriously. The two men picked a menu of
commodity metals and bet whether the price would rise or fall by 1990.
Ehrlich bet that scarcity would drive the price up; Simon bet that they
would go down. Simon won the bet only for temporary circumstantial
reasons, namely that the last great discoveries of cheap, easy-to-get
oil ramped into full production by the mid-1980s and pushed a final orgy
of global industrial development until 2008, when things really started
falling apart. By then, Julian Simon has been dead for a decade.
Simon’s idea lives on in
the wishful thinking around shale oil and gas, which have led the
American public and their leaders to believe that we’re in an “energy
renaissance” that will lead to “energy independence.” Just the other
day, Senator John McCain made the inexcusably dumb remark that the US is
now a net oil exporter. This is a man who ran for president five years
ago, talking completely out of his ass.
Now oil is well over $100 a
barrel, a price that the American economy, as currently configured,
cannot endure. That price is crushing the kind of activity we have
depended on lately: the house-building and lending rackets associated
with the creation of suburban sprawl. $100 oil is especially corrosive
to the problems of capital formation, because without more racket-driven
“growth,” we can neither generate new credit, nor pay the interest on
old credit. We’ve used accounting fraud in banking and government to
cover up this failed equation. But it has only led to greater
deformities in markets and a general fiasco in the management of money
all around the world, and it is spinning out of control right now. If
these conditions were to crash the global economy and the price of
everything fell in a deflationary depression, with oil back under $60 a
barrel — then it would not pay enough to frack the shale rock, or drill
miles under the ocean, or do any of the very expensive operations of
what’s called unconventional oil recovery.
For The New York Times
to keep hauling out the sorry-ass figure of Julian Simon to “prove” a
specious and dangerous point surely shows the limits of one thing:
intelligence in the media. Because of that and other related failures in
the transmission of ideas, this is now a nation that cannot construct a
coherent narrative about what is happening to it.
Now, second: Syria. The
world has pretty much lined up against President Obama’s proposal to
issue a cruise missile spanking to Syria for supposedly gassing its own
citizens. Nobody thinks this is a good idea, some for reasons of
tactical advantage and some on the idea’s basic merit, or lack of. Mr.
Obama pulled his punch over a week ago by standing down and taking the
issue to congress for approval. I’m convinced he did that because he
would have been impeached for launching an overt act of war — despite
similar actions by his recent predecessors. The proposed spanking was a
bad idea from the start. There was no visible threat to the national
interest from Syria’s bad behavior within its own borders. The gas
attack was a terrible act of depravity, but firing missiles into Syria
wasn’t going to bring back the dead. It was only going to cause more
death. There’s no advantage to the US for supporting either side in the
Syrian civil war. The spread or deepening of any kind of disorder in
that region will threaten a critical portion of America’s oil imports.
In the background of this,
things are becoming unstuck in the seriously ill and constipated realm
of international banking. The aforementioned deformities caused by
central bank interventions, market manipulations, Too Big To Fail
carry-trade rackets, and misreporting of financial data have begun to
shred currencies in nations at the margin (India, Brazil, Indonesia) and
that illness may prove contagious. The global economy depends on some
basic faith that major financial institutions are sound, and that they
trade in sound instruments that represent real wealth. That is all being
called into question now, and how long will it be before a general
paralysis freezes the entire letters-of-credit system that underlies
global commerce?
The Syria soap opera has
also managed to upstage the imminent mud-wrestling match between
congress and the executive branch over the national debt limit and
related matters of government spending. These problems appear for now to
be completely intractable. If the government overcomes the latest
version of this recurring dilemma, it will only be due to generating
even more layers of accounting fraud to an already well-papered piñata
that is just waiting to be smashed. While this goes on, the American
public gets pushed deeper and deeper into a financial abyss, haunted by
re-po men, lying bank officers, verminous lawyers, and chiseling
hospital administrators.
All this is a recipe for a
political explosion. What happens if the US Government starts gassing
its own citizens? It happened in 1967. That one only made people cry.
Maybe next time, they’ll use a different kind of gas.
http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/gassy-politics/